How does crimes and misdemeanors end




















Case Scenario. Pros: The boys are going to pay the victim for the TV that they broke. The boys are going to do 20 hours of service work. Cons: The vase they broke won't be able to be fixed or replaced.

The little girl had some nightmares about them. Can you further explain what you mean by reader's view? Do you mean what the reader thinks about the situation? I think an elderly would be horrified and angry and dissapointed at the boys that did this. Depending on the elder, some would punish them. I would also think the elderly would probably be a little cautious leaving their home and precious items Crimes and Misdemeanors study guide contains a biography of director Woody Allen, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.

Crimes and Misdemeanors essays are academic essays for citation. Some states do not classify their misdemeanors—they simply assign a punishment right in the statute that describes or defines the crime. Common examples of misdemeanor crimes include simple assault , shoplifting , trespassing , disorderly conduct , petty theft , and other low-level offenses. Thus, these states have class B or level 2 misdemeanors. In these states, legislators did not use the terms "class" or "level," but they did group their misdemeanor crimes by severity: Georgia misdemeanors and misdemeanors of a high and aggravated nature , Hawaii petty misdemeanor and misdemeanor , Iowa aggravated, serious, or simple , Minnesota gross misdemeanor, misdemeanor, or petty misdemeanor , Nevada gross misdemeanor or misdemeanor , New Jersey disorderly persons offense or petty disorderly persons offense , New Mexico petty misdemeanor or misdemeanor , Rhode Island misdemeanor or petty misdemeanor , and Washington gross misdemeanor or misdemeanor.

As explained above, a crime is a misdemeanor or a felony by virtue of the length of its sentence—sentences of a year or more generally make a crime a felony, while sentences of less than a year indicate that the offense is a misdemeanor. Most laws include the sentence for the crime, so by learning the sentence, you know whether the crime is a misdemeanor or felony.

But a few states, including Arizona, California, and Indiana, have created a group of crimes that can be punished either by time in state prison or in the county jail. Under the California scheme, the characterization of the crime depends on the ultimate punishment meted out.

Such crimes " wobble " between misdemeanor and felony; when the defendant is sentenced to state prison, the offense is a felony, but when the sentence is to a county jail, it becomes a misdemeanor. In California, all such offenses start out as presumed felonies, unless the prosecutor charges them as misdemeanors. California judges can reduce a felony conviction for a wobbler offense to a misdemeanor at sentencing; in some states, courts can reduce the conviction to a misdemeanor when the defendant successfully completes probation.

For the most part, prosecutors have the discretion to charge a particular offense as they deem appropriate, and sometimes that involves choosing to file misdemeanor charges instead of felony charges, or vice versa. For example, someone who gets into a fight and injures another person can be charged with assault. The state's law may differentiate misdemeanor assaults from felony assaults based on, among other factors, the extent of the victim's injuries.

When the injuries aren't clearly in one or the other category, the prosecutor will choose which level to charge. Prosecutorial discretion can be abused when prosecutors "overcharge" acts that should be charged at lower levels.

Judah calls on his mobster brother to kill Dolores, which he does. The second storyline involves Cliff, a nerdy and unsuccessful documentary filmmaker, who is in an unhappy marriage. While working on a documentary about a TV personality named Lester, Cliff falls in love with Halley, a network producer. Halley rebuffs Cliff because he is married. When Cliff finally gets divorced, Halley has become engaged to Lester.

Judah and Cliff meet up at the end of the film, and Judah presents an anonymous version of the murder — as though it might be a plot for a movie.

It becomes clear that Judah got away with the murder, and suffered no long-term guilt. The film was nominated for several Academy Awards, including best screenplay and best director. You see it as harsh and empty of values and pitiless. According to the DVD commentary, Allen used eyes as a pervasive metaphor in the film.

Judah is an eye doctor, the rabbi eventually goes blind, etc. They don't see themselves as others see them. They don't see the right and wrong of situations. He has genuine religious faith. Although Allen claims that the rabbi is detached from the reality of the world, clearly Judah is as detached as the rabbi if not more. During an imaginary conversation with rabbi Ben, Judah describes three levels of aloofness that are characterized in the movie by himself, Ben, and Jack.

I manage to keep free of that real world, but suddenly it's found me. In the case of the rabbi, the view is that the world originates from a wholly good God.

Is what she's doing to me just? Is this what I deserve? Can Judah, therefore, be held morally responsible for creating his own situation? He cares, but at the same time he also demands that you behave morally.

But here comes the paradox. In other words, in spite of millennia of efforts we have not succeeded to create a really and entirely loving image of God. This was beyond our capacity to imagine.

In the documentary footage, Levy comments on the nature of love. The paradox consists of the fact that when we fall in love we are seeking to re-find all or some of the people to whom we were attached as children.

On the other hand we ask of our beloved to correct all of the wrongs that these early parents or siblings inflicted on us. So that love contains in it a contradiction, the attempt to return to the past and the attempt to undo the past.

Visiting his childhood house, Judah imagines his family celebrating the Passover dinner. He asks what happens if a man kills. Remember, history is written by the winners. And if the Nazis had won, future generations would understand the story of World War II quite differently. Once we get that love, it usually lasts us.

But the universe is a pretty cold place. Why must a philosophical system necessarily be incomplete? Near the end of the film Judah explains his murder story as though it might be a plot to a movie.

Then your movie assumes tragic proportions, because in the absence of a God he is forced to assume that responsibility himself. Then you have tragedy. And yet, most human beings seem to have the ability to keep trying and find joy from simple things — from their family, their work, and from the hope that future generations might understand more.

It focuses on the lives of two very different men, Judah Rosenthal and Cliff Stern. The audience watches as the characters lives intersect one another and these two characters take different approaches to life and their choices based on their moral and ethical views. One of the strengths of this film is that it was enjoyable. This was a completely different type of film than, Baraka or Mindwalk, which take the non-verbal and completely verbal styles, respectively.

Crimes and Misdemeanors had humor, good writing and acting, blood, and a guy poops on some woman's chest. Those things just wouldn't fit in Baraka or Mindwalk.

The fact that this movie can mention a person pooping on another person in a sexual context and at the same time by end of the movie leave you to wonder whether God has anything to do with your moral decisions or not, is something that should not be overlooked when praising this movie. But even the pooping has a purpose in the film I believe. The movie discusses whether there are certain actions that are always right or wrong.

For instance, wouldn't it be better for Judah to have his girlfriend murdered rather than for the truth to be left out in the open. The film is scary in that, as I was watching I found myself thinking "Well, yeah, you've got to kill her Judah, it's the best way to go.

This was an excellent film that has caused me to seek out other Woody Allen films. I highly recommend. One is allowed to explore much of what is ethical.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000